Delayed Cord Clamping at Birth: Weighing the Benefits and Considerations
- DPS
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
Delayed cord clamping (DCC) has become a topic of clinical interest and parental inquiry in recent years. Defined as the intentional delay in clamping the umbilical cord after birth—typically by 30 seconds to several minutes—DCC stands in contrast to the historically standard practice of immediate cord clamping (ICC), which is performed within the first 15–30 seconds postpartum.
Professional bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), have updated their guidelines in support of DCC in specific clinical contexts. But is delayed cord clamping universally beneficial—or are there situations where it may pose risk?
What Happens During Delayed Cord Clamping?
After delivery, the placenta continues to pulse, delivering oxygen-rich blood to the newborn through the umbilical cord. Delaying clamping allows for continued placental transfusion, potentially increasing the infant’s blood volume by 20–40 mL/kg over 2–3 minutes.
This transfusion includes:
Red blood cells (increasing hemoglobin)
Iron stores
Stem cells and immune cells
Plasma volume for circulatory support
Evidence-Based Benefits of Delayed Cord Clamping
1. In Term Infants
Improved iron stores: DCC significantly improves iron status at 4–6 months of age, which may reduce the risk of anemia.
Higher hemoglobin levels: A meta-analysis (McDonald et al., Cochrane Database, 2013) showed a modest increase in neonatal hemoglobin levels with DCC at 24–48 hours.
Potential neurodevelopmental benefit: Some studies suggest a positive association between DCC and improved fine motor and social development at 4 years of age, particularly in boys.
2. In Preterm Infants
Reduced need for blood transfusions
Lower incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH)
Decreased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Improved blood pressure and circulatory stability
These findings have prompted stronger endorsements for DCC in preterm neonates, often in the 30–60 second range.
Potential Concerns and Limitations
While DCC is generally safe, there are specific considerations:
1. Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia
Increased red blood cell mass may slightly elevate the risk of jaundice, requiring phototherapy. However, systematic reviews indicate that the benefit-to-risk ratio still favors DCC in most settings.
2. Delayed Resuscitation
In cases of non-vigorous or asphyxiated infants, immediate neonatal care may take precedence over DCC. However, new research is exploring resuscitation with an intact cord, using bedside neonatal trolleys (e.g., the “LifeStart” system).
3. Maternal Considerations
DCC has not been shown to significantly increase maternal hemorrhage or postpartum blood loss, but practitioners should remain attentive during the third stage of labor to manage uterine tone and placental separation.
DCC and Cord Blood Banking: A Clinical Trade-Off?
One key point of discussion is the potential compromise between delayed cord clamping and cord blood collection for stem cell banking. Since the volume of collected cord blood is reduced if clamping is delayed beyond 60–90 seconds, families choosing private banking should be counseled that DCC may reduce sample yield or cell count.
Clinicians may consider customized protocols, such as clamping at 60 seconds for partial transfusion while preserving banking potential—though this requires case-by-case assessment.
Professional Guidelines Summary
WHO: Recommends DCC for 1–3 minutes in all births, unless immediate resuscitation is needed.
ACOG: Recommends at least 30–60 seconds delay in vigorous term and preterm infants.
RCOG: Supports a delay of at least 1 minute in the absence of contraindications.
Conclusion
Delayed cord clamping is a well-supported practice with demonstrable benefits for both term and preterm infants. While the optimal timing may vary based on clinical context, the majority of evidence supports a delay of at least 30–60 seconds, barring contraindications. As with any intervention, individualization of care—particularly in cases involving neonatal distress or planned cord blood banking—is key to optimizing outcomes for both infant and mother.
Sources
McDonald SJ, et al. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.
Fogarty M, et al. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2672335
WHO Recommendations on Newborn Health.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 814. Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping After Birth.
Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA. Non-vigorous newborns and umbilical cord management: A review of current recommendations. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020.
留言